STOP SMARTPORT!

News about the NAFTA Superhighway and the Kansas City SmartPort

StopSmartPort.com

NaftaSuperhighway.info


 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon

Join our FREE Email Mailing List

SSP HomeExclusivesUp the Pike to KC?NewTradeAct
What's Coming up the Pike to Kansas City?

EXCLUSIVE REPORT!

By Colleen Ballard Hayes
Printed here first!
July 13,2008

                                   

 WHAT IS COMING UP THE PIKE TO KANSAS CITY?

© Copyright 2008 Colleen Ballard Hayes

    
    
Kansas Representative Judy Morrison appeared May 28 on CNN’s Lou Dobbs 
Tonight in a segment

on “NAFTA Superhighway:  Threat to Our Sovereignty”.
“…Open borders advocates are refusing to

acknowledge rising evidence of plans 
for a NAFTA superhighway,” Dobbs opened the segment.  “Many in

the mainstream 
media absolutely refuse to acknowledge the reality.  The plans could be a major step

toward that North American Union of the United States, Canada and Mexico.” 
Dobbs

added:  “President Bush says opponents of a NAFTA Superhighway in his
view are laying out a
 
conspiracy.  Senator Obama says he sees no evidence of a 
North American Union.”

    
    U.S. Congressman Ted Poe (®
Texas), a guest on the show, countered: “The folks in Washington are in denial about the super NAFTA highway or whatever you want to call it.  It’s the concept that there will be a highway, free trade from Mexico through the central part of the United States all the way to Canada.”

 
   
“In Texas planning and development is under way for what are officially called
Transportation corridors,” said CNN correspondent Bill Tucker.  “The Trans Texas Corridor, I-69, a combination of rail lines, utility lines, car and truck lanes, plan to be as wide as three football fields laid end to end.  “It will be financed by a private foreign company.  Most likely Spain’s Cintra, who will then own the lease on the road and the revenue generated by the tolls. Texas may use eminent domain to lay claim to some of the land needed to build it.   For an imaginary road there’s a lot of money and effort involved in some real opposition.”

     “There’s just no doubt that this is happening,” noted Terri Hall, TexasTurf.org. “We’ve been to the public hearings.  We’ve seen the presentations.  We’ve seen the documents.  We waded through them and there’s a whole lot more groups besides just ours. And we’ve got Farm Bureau, Sierra Club, a whole host of groups from  the left and the right.”  (Hall was named “San Antonian of the Year” in 2007 by listeners of San Antonio’s WOAI radio for her leadership opposing the Trans Texas Corridor -- a total of 4,000 miles of interstate in Texas alone, including I-69 and I-35, and considered the starting segment of a planned NAFTA superhighway.)

     “In Kansas,” Tucker said, “a resolution opposing the superhighway overwhelmingly passed the State House.”  Representative Judy Morrison, who sponsored the resolution (H.C.R. 5033) in Kansas, said, The documentation is there and some of it has been obtained through the Freedom of Information Act…”     Tucker explained:  “The Smart Port Web site says it offers quote, ‘the heart of a rail corridor spanning coast to coast across the U.S. and extending from Canada to Mexico, a NAFTA railway.’  And what drives it all?  Imports…”

     Imports of goods from 1994 to 2007,  from Mexico to the U.S. rose by 326 percent,  reaching
almost $211 billion last year,
explains Alan Tonelson, Research
Fellow at the U.S. Business and
Industry Council, a business group.  But goods exports from the United States to Mexico rose by only
169 percent
, according to Tonelson.  The difference (when imports are larger than exports) is referred
to as a trade deficit.

     And the trade deficit has a huge impact on our economy.  “Since NAFTA and the WTO went into effect in 1994 and 1995, the U.S. trade deficit has risen from under $100 billion to $709 billion or more than five percent of national income – a figure widely believed to be unsustainable, putting the U.S. and global economies at risk of crisis, shocks and instability.”, warns Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch in Washington, D.C.

    Consider the case of Red China:  Exports of goods from the U.S. to China were only $65, 236,100,000 in 2007, compared with a whopping $321,442,900,000 in imports (of goods) from Red China to the United States in 2007!  (U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division)  

     So  who is benefiting from this avalanche of cheaply made, unwanted products from Mexico and other Third World countries such as Communist China?  The big global corporations.  Tens of thousands of U.S. factories have moved their operations to these Third World nations, taking with them “…the more than three million actual and potential jobs eliminated from the U.S. economy by growing trade deficits in the wake of NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, and the approval of a number of other trade agreements negotiated by the Clinton Administration* between 1994 and 2000,” noted Robert Scott, Senior International Economist, the Economic Policy Institute.**   Such corporations get almost free labor*** without having to pay benefits to their workers.  (In Red China, some corporations reportedly use slave labor.)

     The superhighway will further speed up the killing profits these U.S. corporations are making, holding our nation hostage to such amoral nations as Communist China, with a gargantuan highway dividing our nation and no one (is)  (article is continued below)


  
*President G.H.W. Bush signed the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1992, and after Congress passed it as Public Law 103-182, President Clinton signed it into law December 8, 1993.  NAFTA became effective January 1, 1994.

     **The dollar appreciation of about 30 percent and the economic boom which   ended in 2001 also contributed to growing U.S. trade deficits.

      ***”The average weekly salary for Mexican maquila workers in 2006 was about $66 for a 48-hour work week,” said Judy Ancel, Director, The Institute for Labor Studies, University of Missouri-Kansas City.  (This low average wage is in a region where the cost of living is as high as on the U.S. side of the border.)  In China, “…many workers slave away for pennies on the dollar when compared to American wages,” writes Senator Byron Dorgan in Take This Job and Ship It, published August 2006).

Continued Below...

Continued from Above
What's Coming Down the Pike to Kansas City?
by Colleen Ballard Hayes

really checking on what is in all these sealed containers from China and Mexico, eventually shipped in-bond to Kansas City SmartPort and other inland “customs ports” (called NAIPN[1] -- now a subcommittee of NASCO[2] -- on the North American Super Corridor Coalition’s website:   http://www.nascocorridor.com/naipn/pages/about.html).

     Foreign containers will be checked only electronically at the Mexican-U.S. border by the mostly unproven Sentri system (Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspections.)   Such electronic checking of potentially dangerous cargo through U.S. customs cannot even begin to replace the accuracy and thoroughness of hand inspections traditionally used by U.S. Customs officials, but with the volume of containers entering the U.S., thorough inspections seem not to be the priority.  No, the volume of foreign manufactured products is the No. 1 priority, as if we U.S. citizens were in dire need of all the tainted toothpaste, dangerous toys, toxic tomatoes and other deficient products and millions of worthless gadgets being spewed out in foreign nations with inadequate quality control, safety and environmental standards, or oversight!  (If any standards exist, they are largely ignored for fear U.S. corporations will shut down their plants and move elsewhere.)

     “The DOT is doing a poor job of inspecting American trucks, with only 40 percent inspected,” reported Clayton Reid in America Under Invasion…by Mexican  Trucks, September 6, 2007 (Newsmax.com).  “How are they going to inspect trucks in Mexico?  The DEA constantly finds Mexican trucks smuggling drugs, human beings and who knows what kind of contraband.  There is massive organized criminal smuggling activity going on at the border.” 

    
It is the vast bulk of American citizenry who are being victimized and deceived and are paying the price of rapidly rising prices and poor (even deadly) quality of  foreign goods.  If al-Qaida gets into this mix,” warned Reid,  “We will have a nightmare. You could have nuclear weapons, dirty bombs or terrorists in those trucks, and no one would ever know.”

          CNN’s Bill Tucker explained on Lou Dobbs’ May 28 show:  “…according to the Texas Department of Transportation, three-quarters of all the traffic from Mexico to the United States comes across the Texas border and all that traffic they say needs to be accommodated somehow and, Lou, it’s hard for an imaginary road to accommodate that much real traffic.”

     Lou Dobbs summed up a major source of disinformation aimed at the public:  “It’s what happens when you have, let’s say, so-called mainstream journalists in what I would call Napoleonic denial.  They’re laughable.  They are so arrogant in their ignorance of these issues and yet the little delititions (ph.) step in to it as if they know something.

    “They think it’s like they’re political reporting that they can simply bring an impressionistic brush across the sweep and that that will pass for facts.


    
For real facts on this subject, see Kansas Legislation and Special Reports at the top of

www.stopsmartport.com
.

---End of article---



Notes:

1.     NAIPN = North American Inland Ports Network.   

2.     NASCO = North American Super Corridor Coalition.

 

Sources and Links:

Colleen - 

1 - Since the values are in millions, you need to add 6 digits to the end.

The first digit is the 9, so it would be $5,854,900,000.

 

2 - The trade balance is calculated by taking exports minus imports. If

imports are larger, that would be a trade deficit.

 

3 - We do not have percent changes calculated as part of our statistics,

but it would be pretty easy to calculate from the data on these pages:

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/index.html

 

The formula for percent change is: (Current value minus previous value)

divided by previous value.

 

For example, using imports from China:

2007 (Current): $321,442.9

1994 (Previous): $38,786.8

 

(321,442.9 - 38,786.8)/38,786.8 = 7.287, or 728.7%

 

 

Joe Kafchinski

 

US Census Bureau - Foreign Trade Division

Direct - 301-763-6956 :: Office - 301-763-2311

http://www.census.gov/trade

 

(The first free trade agreement in North American was signed by the U.S. under President G.H.W. Bush with Canada. The CUSFTA was the beginning of even larger regional trading blocs. After just five years, on January 1, 1994, the CUSFTA was replaced by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which includes Mexico. (See 1994—North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): Creating the World’s Largest Free Trade Area.)

Links

 

MAQUILADORAS: A PREVIEW OF NAFTA

Adapted from a Maquila Solidarity Network pamphlet, June 1995

Although foreign-owned maquiladora assembly plants were operating in the Mexico/US border region three decades before the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the maquiladora experience was a preview of what free trade held in store for the Mexican people.

What began as an exceptional program restricted to the border region, eventually became the core of the Mexican government's export-led economic development strategy. Under the program, foreign-owned companies are allowed to import component parts to be assembled by Mexican workers, and then to re-export the finished product almost duty-free.

Today, close to 4,000 maquiladora assembly plants employ an estimated 900,000 Mexican workers producing everything from auto parts to television sets to "docker" jeans. Though we tend to think of maquilas as low-tech sweat shops, many of the newer maquila factories employ state-of-the-art technology.

While 81 percent of Mexico's maquila plants are located in industrial parks along its 3,000 mile border with the US, increasingly multinational corporations are setting up maquilas in the interior of the country. Since the signing of NAFTA, there has also been an increase in foreign investment in garment production for export in southern Mexico. Many Mexicans fear that NAFTA could make the whole country into a maquila zone.

The names of the companies that have shifted or contracted parts of their production to the maquila zones are familiar to all of us - General Electric, Zenith, Honeywell, General Motors, Matsushita (Panasonic), Chrysler, Hallmark Cards, General Electric, Ford Motor, Panasonic, Sonyo, Mattel, Hasbro, Hyundai, Converse, etc.

Although some Canadian firms have invested in Mexico's maquilas, particularly in the autoparts sector, most maquilas are US- or Japan-owned. Recently, there has also been an increase in Korean investment in the Tijuana area. However, the fact that many US-based multinationals, such as General Motors and Ford, now produce in both Canada and Mexico means that our future is directly tied with the fate of Mexican workers and communities.

 

“In 1994 the United States had a `1.3-billion-dollar trade surplus with Mexico.  Ten years later it has become a 45-billion-dollar trade deficit,” writes Senator Byron Dorgan (D., S.D.) in his book, Take this Job and Ship It.  “And still, some argue it is a success.  Not for us it isn’t.”

Postscript added by Author Colleen Ballard Hayes:
July 14, 2008
Mansfield News-Mirror reported June 27, 2008,
 
"Security effort by DPS, border patrol to target truckers:
 
"In the first eight months of fiscal year 2008, Border Patrol agents in Texas intercepted 423 tractor trailers resulting in the detainment of more than 1,800 undocumented immigrants and more than 112,000 pounds of illegal drugs. In the Laredo area, 330 truck drivers have been caught smuggling drugs or humans into Texas in the past 18 months, the governor's office reported June 19."